<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 1610 - ITAT RAJKOT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276360</link>
    <description>The appeals were partly allowed, with several issues being remitted back to the Assessing Officer for re-evaluation and verification. The Tribunal upheld the disallowance of conveyance expenses and the treatment of certain allowances as salary income, while allowing the claim for business procurement expenses as per the LIC scheme for A.Y. 2010-11 and directing further verification for subsequent years. The determination of ALV and interest expenditure against house property income was also remitted for reassessment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2018 10:58:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=541079" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 1610 - ITAT RAJKOT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276360</link>
      <description>The appeals were partly allowed, with several issues being remitted back to the Assessing Officer for re-evaluation and verification. The Tribunal upheld the disallowance of conveyance expenses and the treatment of certain allowances as salary income, while allowing the claim for business procurement expenses as per the LIC scheme for A.Y. 2010-11 and directing further verification for subsequent years. The determination of ALV and interest expenditure against house property income was also remitted for reassessment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276360</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>