https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370030 Interim protection to continue existing audit assignments was sought to be extended, but the request was rejected because the same grounds had already been considered in earlier interim orders and no fresh basis was shown. The record indicated that a suitable Bench had been available for a substantial period, yet no effective step was taken to secure hearing of the main appeals. In view of the chronology of events and the unconvincing urgency pleaded, the application for further continuation of the interim relief was dismissed. en-us Wed, 17 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 08 Nov 2018 10:57:51 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370030 Interim protection to continue existing audit assignments was sought to be extended, but the request was rejected because the same grounds had already been considered in earlier interim orders and no fresh basis was shown. The record indicated that a suitable Bench had been available for a substantial period, yet no effective step was taken to secure hearing of the main appeals. In view of the chronology of events and the unconvincing urgency pleaded, the application for further continuation of the interim relief was dismissed. Case-Laws Companies Law Wed, 17 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370030