https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276357 Where the juridical seat of arbitration is London and the arbitration agreement is governed by English law, Part I of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 is excluded by necessary implication and the Indian curial regime does not apply. On that basis, a Section 14 application was held not maintainable. The attempt to reopen the earlier determination of seat and governing law was also rejected, because those matters had already been conclusively decided and the renewed challenge was treated as barred and an abuse of process. en-us Tue, 22 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 08 Nov 2018 10:57:13 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276357 Where the juridical seat of arbitration is London and the arbitration agreement is governed by English law, Part I of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 is excluded by necessary implication and the Indian curial regime does not apply. On that basis, a Section 14 application was held not maintainable. The attempt to reopen the earlier determination of seat and governing law was also rejected, because those matters had already been conclusively decided and the renewed challenge was treated as barred and an abuse of process. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 22 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276357