https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276357 The Supreme Court reaffirmed that Part I of the Arbitration Act, 1996 does not apply to an arbitration agreement governed by English law with a seat in London. The validity of the partial consent award was upheld, dismissing arguments against it. The principle of res judicata applied, preventing the Union of India from re-litigating the jurisdictional issue. As a result, the Special Leave Petition was dismissed, affirming the Delhi High Court's judgment. en-us Tue, 22 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 08 Nov 2018 10:57:13 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276357 The Supreme Court reaffirmed that Part I of the Arbitration Act, 1996 does not apply to an arbitration agreement governed by English law with a seat in London. The validity of the partial consent award was upheld, dismissing arguments against it. The principle of res judicata applied, preventing the Union of India from re-litigating the jurisdictional issue. As a result, the Special Leave Petition was dismissed, affirming the Delhi High Court's judgment. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 22 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276357