<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (6) TMI 1018 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276358</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court upheld the High Court&#039;s decision to grant bail to the respondent, emphasizing the right to bail under Section 167(2) CrPC accrues if the charge-sheet is not filed within the statutory period. The Court criticized delays in considering bail applications and extensions, reaffirming that the right must be enforced promptly. The appeal was dismissed, highlighting that allowing adjournments to enable the prosecution to file the charge-sheet and extinguish the bail right goes against legislative intent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2018 10:57:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=541061" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (6) TMI 1018 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276358</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court upheld the High Court&#039;s decision to grant bail to the respondent, emphasizing the right to bail under Section 167(2) CrPC accrues if the charge-sheet is not filed within the statutory period. The Court criticized delays in considering bail applications and extensions, reaffirming that the right must be enforced promptly. The appeal was dismissed, highlighting that allowing adjournments to enable the prosecution to file the charge-sheet and extinguish the bail right goes against legislative intent.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276358</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>