https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370022 The court held that the daughter-in-law could be considered a trustee or in a fiduciary capacity for her mother-in-law under the Benami Transaction Act. The suit was not barred by limitation as the cause of action arose later. It was established that the property was purchased by the mother-in-law and held in trust by the daughter-in-law for the family's benefit. The court declared the mother-in-law as the sole owner of the property, rejecting claims from the daughter-in-law's family for possession and mesne profits. The court's decision addressed all issues comprehensively, leading to different outcomes in separate suits. en-us Fri, 02 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 25 Dec 2019 18:42:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370022 The court held that the daughter-in-law could be considered a trustee or in a fiduciary capacity for her mother-in-law under the Benami Transaction Act. The suit was not barred by limitation as the cause of action arose later. It was established that the property was purchased by the mother-in-law and held in trust by the daughter-in-law for the family's benefit. The court declared the mother-in-law as the sole owner of the property, rejecting claims from the daughter-in-law's family for possession and mesne profits. The court's decision addressed all issues comprehensively, leading to different outcomes in separate suits. Case-Laws Benami Property Fri, 02 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370022