<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 362 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370019</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled that the appellant&#039;s services should be classified as &quot;Works Contract Service&quot; instead of &quot;Residential Complex Service.&quot; It found the demand and penalties imposed based on the incorrect classification unsustainable. Citing legal precedents, the Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned order and granting consequential benefits to the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2018 10:56:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=541056" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 362 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370019</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled that the appellant&#039;s services should be classified as &quot;Works Contract Service&quot; instead of &quot;Residential Complex Service.&quot; It found the demand and penalties imposed based on the incorrect classification unsustainable. Citing legal precedents, the Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned order and granting consequential benefits to the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370019</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>