<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 359 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370016</link>
    <description>The Revenue&#039;s appeal was rejected, affirming the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals) to partially allow the appeal by setting aside penalties and the demand for service tax on exempted services pending verification. The judgment emphasized that if the assessee had indeed provided exempted services, no tax could be demanded for those services. The decision to set aside the demand was subject to verification by the Original Adjudicating Authority.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2018 10:56:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=541053" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 359 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370016</link>
      <description>The Revenue&#039;s appeal was rejected, affirming the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals) to partially allow the appeal by setting aside penalties and the demand for service tax on exempted services pending verification. The judgment emphasized that if the assessee had indeed provided exempted services, no tax could be demanded for those services. The decision to set aside the demand was subject to verification by the Original Adjudicating Authority.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370016</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>