<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (3) TMI 32 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15105</link>
    <description>The court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s findings, concluding that the sum of Rs. 20,593 could not be treated as advances in the money-lending business and was not admissible as a bad debt. The court also rejected the claim of the amount as a business loss. The Revenue was awarded costs of Rs. 750.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 11:07:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=54105" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (3) TMI 32 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15105</link>
      <description>The court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s findings, concluding that the sum of Rs. 20,593 could not be treated as advances in the money-lending business and was not admissible as a bad debt. The court also rejected the claim of the amount as a business loss. The Revenue was awarded costs of Rs. 750.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15105</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>