<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 356 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370013</link>
    <description>The extended period of limitation cannot be invoked for demand of reversal of Cenvat credit on inputs cleared as such to sister units where the arrangement is revenue neutral and there is no mala fide suppression or misstatement with intent to evade duty. The duty attributable to the disputed reversal would have remained available as credit to the recipient units for payment of excise duty, so no evasion intent could be attributed. Accordingly, the demand could not be sustained on the basis of the extended limitation period.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2018 08:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=541048" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 356 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370013</link>
      <description>The extended period of limitation cannot be invoked for demand of reversal of Cenvat credit on inputs cleared as such to sister units where the arrangement is revenue neutral and there is no mala fide suppression or misstatement with intent to evade duty. The duty attributable to the disputed reversal would have remained available as credit to the recipient units for payment of excise duty, so no evasion intent could be attributed. Accordingly, the demand could not be sustained on the basis of the extended limitation period.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370013</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>