<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 356 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370013</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the appellant, a subsidiary of Coal India Ltd., was justified in not reversing Cenvat Credit on inputs cleared to sister units due to a revenue-neutral scenario post-centralized registration. The Tribunal applied the doctrine of Revenue neutrality, considering the excess credit utilized by sister units for excise duty payments. As a result, the extended period of limitation was not applicable, leading to the setting aside of the impugned orders and allowing the appeal with consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2018 08:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=541048" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 356 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370013</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the appellant, a subsidiary of Coal India Ltd., was justified in not reversing Cenvat Credit on inputs cleared to sister units due to a revenue-neutral scenario post-centralized registration. The Tribunal applied the doctrine of Revenue neutrality, considering the excess credit utilized by sister units for excise duty payments. As a result, the extended period of limitation was not applicable, leading to the setting aside of the impugned orders and allowing the appeal with consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370013</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>