https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370010 The appellant successfully challenged the recovery of Cenvat Credit based on endorsed documents from alleged fake/non-existent firms. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the demand made under the extended period of limitation. The appellant argued compliance with Rule 7(2) and refuted allegations of availing credit from bogus firms. The penalty imposed on the rebate claim was also overturned due to lack of evidence and substantiation in the Show Cause Notice. The appeals were allowed, and the appellant's contentions were upheld. en-us Thu, 01 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 08 Nov 2018 10:55:07 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370010 The appellant successfully challenged the recovery of Cenvat Credit based on endorsed documents from alleged fake/non-existent firms. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the demand made under the extended period of limitation. The appellant argued compliance with Rule 7(2) and refuted allegations of availing credit from bogus firms. The penalty imposed on the rebate claim was also overturned due to lack of evidence and substantiation in the Show Cause Notice. The appeals were allowed, and the appellant's contentions were upheld. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 01 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370010