<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (5) TMI 31 - DELHI High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15104</link>
    <description>The court directed the Tribunal to re-examine the classification of certain equipment for development rebate and provide a detailed rationale for classifying the assessee-bank as an industrial undertaking. This re-evaluation would impact deductions under section 80J and the admissibility of the provision for gratuity, emphasizing the need for a well-founded decision on these matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 May 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 11:04:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=54104" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (5) TMI 31 - DELHI High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15104</link>
      <description>The court directed the Tribunal to re-examine the classification of certain equipment for development rebate and provide a detailed rationale for classifying the assessee-bank as an industrial undertaking. This re-evaluation would impact deductions under section 80J and the admissibility of the provision for gratuity, emphasizing the need for a well-founded decision on these matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 May 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15104</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>