<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 350 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370007</link>
    <description>The penalty imposition under section 11AC was deemed unwarranted as the appellant rectified the error promptly and had no intent to evade duty. The penalty was set aside, maintaining the duty demand and interest, resulting in the appeal being partly allowed with consequential relief granted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2018 17:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=541037" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 350 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370007</link>
      <description>The penalty imposition under section 11AC was deemed unwarranted as the appellant rectified the error promptly and had no intent to evade duty. The penalty was set aside, maintaining the duty demand and interest, resulting in the appeal being partly allowed with consequential relief granted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370007</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>