https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370006 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the rejection of the refund claim amounting to Rs. 8,28,292. It held that the appellant, a Small Scale Industry, was entitled to the refund despite not challenging the initial assessment order. The Tribunal found the refund claim valid as it was made in time and due to a genuine mistake regarding the interpretation of Cenvat Credit Rules. The appellant's use of rented premises for job work for another unit was considered legitimate, and the Tribunal granted consequential relief in favor of the appellant. en-us Thu, 01 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 07 Nov 2018 10:16:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370006 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the rejection of the refund claim amounting to Rs. 8,28,292. It held that the appellant, a Small Scale Industry, was entitled to the refund despite not challenging the initial assessment order. The Tribunal found the refund claim valid as it was made in time and due to a genuine mistake regarding the interpretation of Cenvat Credit Rules. The appellant's use of rented premises for job work for another unit was considered legitimate, and the Tribunal granted consequential relief in favor of the appellant. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 01 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370006