<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1961 (10) TMI 98 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276354</link>
    <description>Whether a sum realised on transfer of a plantation estate constituted profit from an adventure in the nature of trade or a capital accretion was determined by reference to the assessee&#039;s intention at acquisition, conduct between acquisition and sale, and surrounding circumstances; the analysis held that mere family involvement in planting, use of borrowed funds, isolated associations, transfers between related parties, or subsequent sale do not alone convert a capital asset into trading stock, and where the estate was worked and enjoyed with withdrawals and loan repayments over years the receipt was a capital accretion, not a revenue gain.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Oct 1961 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2018 10:42:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=541023" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1961 (10) TMI 98 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276354</link>
      <description>Whether a sum realised on transfer of a plantation estate constituted profit from an adventure in the nature of trade or a capital accretion was determined by reference to the assessee&#039;s intention at acquisition, conduct between acquisition and sale, and surrounding circumstances; the analysis held that mere family involvement in planting, use of borrowed funds, isolated associations, transfers between related parties, or subsequent sale do not alone convert a capital asset into trading stock, and where the estate was worked and enjoyed with withdrawals and loan repayments over years the receipt was a capital accretion, not a revenue gain.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Oct 1961 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276354</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>