https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276342 The High Court issued a notice returnable on a specific date and granted ad-interim relief by restraining the respondent from further proceedings based on the impugned notice. Additionally, direct service was permitted for certain respondents. The petitioner, a legal practitioner, challenged a notice issued by the Commissioner under sub-section (2) of section 81 of the Gujarat Value Added Tax Act, arguing that the Commissioner lacked authority to disqualify him as he was enrolled with the Bar Council of Gujarat and no longer a sales tax practitioner. The petitioner emphasized that only the Bar Council of Gujarat could take disciplinary action against him as a legal practitioner. en-us Tue, 03 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 08 Nov 2018 10:12:12 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276342 The High Court issued a notice returnable on a specific date and granted ad-interim relief by restraining the respondent from further proceedings based on the impugned notice. Additionally, direct service was permitted for certain respondents. The petitioner, a legal practitioner, challenged a notice issued by the Commissioner under sub-section (2) of section 81 of the Gujarat Value Added Tax Act, arguing that the Commissioner lacked authority to disqualify him as he was enrolled with the Bar Council of Gujarat and no longer a sales tax practitioner. The petitioner emphasized that only the Bar Council of Gujarat could take disciplinary action against him as a legal practitioner. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Tue, 03 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276342