<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (2) TMI 1398 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276343</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee, emphasizing that the rejection of account books based solely on alleged excess electricity consumption was unjustified. The court held that suspicion arising from high electricity usage should prompt further investigation but cannot be the sole reason for discarding books. The judgment highlighted that without additional evidence of unreliability, excess electricity consumption alone is insufficient grounds for rejection. The decision aligned with established legal principles, emphasizing that excess consumption may raise suspicion but is not conclusive evidence of accounting irregularities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2018 10:12:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=541013" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (2) TMI 1398 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276343</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee, emphasizing that the rejection of account books based solely on alleged excess electricity consumption was unjustified. The court held that suspicion arising from high electricity usage should prompt further investigation but cannot be the sole reason for discarding books. The judgment highlighted that without additional evidence of unreliability, excess electricity consumption alone is insufficient grounds for rejection. The decision aligned with established legal principles, emphasizing that excess consumption may raise suspicion but is not conclusive evidence of accounting irregularities.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276343</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>