https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369997 Notice to respondent No. 3 was dispensed with at the appellants' risk in an intra-court appeal. The court treated interim protection as necessary because implementation of the impugned refund direction could have rendered the appeal infructuous. The order directing refund was therefore stayed until the next date of hearing. en-us Wed, 31 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 07 Nov 2018 08:17:51 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369997 Notice to respondent No. 3 was dispensed with at the appellants' risk in an intra-court appeal. The court treated interim protection as necessary because implementation of the impugned refund direction could have rendered the appeal infructuous. The order directing refund was therefore stayed until the next date of hearing. Case-Laws Income Tax Wed, 31 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369997