<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 339 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369996</link>
    <description>The tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal on all grounds and allowed the assessee&#039;s cross-objection, directing the AO to delete the additions. The tribunal found that the CIT(A) had rightly deleted the additions, as the expenses and transactions were genuine, necessary for the business, and duly accounted for in the books. The AO&#039;s actions were deemed arbitrary and not based on proper appreciation of facts and evidence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2018 11:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=541001" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 339 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369996</link>
      <description>The tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal on all grounds and allowed the assessee&#039;s cross-objection, directing the AO to delete the additions. The tribunal found that the CIT(A) had rightly deleted the additions, as the expenses and transactions were genuine, necessary for the business, and duly accounted for in the books. The AO&#039;s actions were deemed arbitrary and not based on proper appreciation of facts and evidence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369996</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>