<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1963 (8) TMI 65 - MYSORE HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276326</link>
    <description>The court determined that the remuneration of Rs. 6,000 paid to Shri G.V. Dhakappa should be considered his individual income and not the income of the Hindu undivided family. The court ruled in favor of the assessee, stating that including the salary in the total income of the assessee family was illegal. The revenue was directed to pay costs, including an advocate&#039;s fee of Rs. 250.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 1963 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2018 12:38:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=540982" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1963 (8) TMI 65 - MYSORE HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276326</link>
      <description>The court determined that the remuneration of Rs. 6,000 paid to Shri G.V. Dhakappa should be considered his individual income and not the income of the Hindu undivided family. The court ruled in favor of the assessee, stating that including the salary in the total income of the assessee family was illegal. The revenue was directed to pay costs, including an advocate&#039;s fee of Rs. 250.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 1963 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276326</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>