<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (11) TMI 32 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15094</link>
    <description>The court determined that the income of Rs. 45,000 from the Malayalam dubbing rights accrued during the previous year, while the Rs. 50,000 from the Tamil dubbing rights did not accrue in the same period. The Commissioner&#039;s order including the income in the assessment year was upheld, emphasizing that the contract became binding upon the exchange of promises. The court referenced a prior case to support its decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 18:52:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=54094" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (11) TMI 32 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15094</link>
      <description>The court determined that the income of Rs. 45,000 from the Malayalam dubbing rights accrued during the previous year, while the Rs. 50,000 from the Tamil dubbing rights did not accrue in the same period. The Commissioner&#039;s order including the income in the assessment year was upheld, emphasizing that the contract became binding upon the exchange of promises. The court referenced a prior case to support its decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15094</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>