<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 330 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369987</link>
    <description>The court held that the Assessing Officer, the CIT(A), and the Tribunal correctly applied the principle of grossing up. The substantial question of law was answered against the assessee, and the appeals were dismissed. The court emphasized that the income should be computed under the provisions of the Income Tax Act, and the tax liability borne by the assessee must be added to the income of the University of Warwick for the purpose of tax deduction at source.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2018 13:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=540938" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 330 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369987</link>
      <description>The court held that the Assessing Officer, the CIT(A), and the Tribunal correctly applied the principle of grossing up. The substantial question of law was answered against the assessee, and the appeals were dismissed. The court emphasized that the income should be computed under the provisions of the Income Tax Act, and the tax liability borne by the assessee must be added to the income of the University of Warwick for the purpose of tax deduction at source.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369987</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>