<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 327 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369984</link>
    <description>The Tribunal addressed issues regarding rectification of a mistake in the order, eligibility of deduction under section 54F for multiple property investments, and verification of claimed expenditures for allowing the deduction under section 54F. The decision upheld the revenue&#039;s stance on the eligibility of deductions for multiple properties but directed the Assessing Officer to verify and examine the claimed expenditures for the residential property in question.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2018 07:20:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=540935" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 327 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369984</link>
      <description>The Tribunal addressed issues regarding rectification of a mistake in the order, eligibility of deduction under section 54F for multiple property investments, and verification of claimed expenditures for allowing the deduction under section 54F. The decision upheld the revenue&#039;s stance on the eligibility of deductions for multiple properties but directed the Assessing Officer to verify and examine the claimed expenditures for the residential property in question.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369984</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>