https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369981 The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, and the order was pronounced on 29th October 2018. The case involved challenging additions made on account of cash and unexplained deposits in bank accounts for Assessment Year 2009-10. The Assessing Officer added deposits totaling Rs. 2,73,00,000 under section 68 of the Act. The CIT(A) upheld the additions, stating the assessee failed to discharge the onus. However, upon review, it was found that the evidence and explanations provided were not properly considered. The matter was remanded back to the Assessing Officer for proper evaluation of the evidence. en-us Mon, 29 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 06 Nov 2018 07:20:08 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369981 The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, and the order was pronounced on 29th October 2018. The case involved challenging additions made on account of cash and unexplained deposits in bank accounts for Assessment Year 2009-10. The Assessing Officer added deposits totaling Rs. 2,73,00,000 under section 68 of the Act. The CIT(A) upheld the additions, stating the assessee failed to discharge the onus. However, upon review, it was found that the evidence and explanations provided were not properly considered. The matter was remanded back to the Assessing Officer for proper evaluation of the evidence. Case-Laws Income Tax Mon, 29 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369981