<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 314 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369971</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the appeal challenging the grant of a Customs Broker license under the Customs Brokers Licensing Regulations, 2013. It affirmed the decision of the Customs, Excise and Service Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) regarding the maintainability of the appeal, emphasizing that appeals to CESTAT were limited to persons aggrieved by orders of the Commissioner acting as an adjudicating authority. The court interpreted Section 129A of the Customs Act, noting that the right to appeal is a statutory mandate and cannot be claimed as a matter of right unless provided for by the controlling enactment. The judgment upheld the decision of CESTAT without interference.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Nov 2019 15:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=540922" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 314 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369971</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the appeal challenging the grant of a Customs Broker license under the Customs Brokers Licensing Regulations, 2013. It affirmed the decision of the Customs, Excise and Service Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) regarding the maintainability of the appeal, emphasizing that appeals to CESTAT were limited to persons aggrieved by orders of the Commissioner acting as an adjudicating authority. The court interpreted Section 129A of the Customs Act, noting that the right to appeal is a statutory mandate and cannot be claimed as a matter of right unless provided for by the controlling enactment. The judgment upheld the decision of CESTAT without interference.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369971</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>