<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 306 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369963</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the demand for the extended period of limitation and penalty under section 78. The activity was found exempted for a specific period as per relevant notifications, with the demand from 11.07.2014 deemed sustainable under the amended notification. The appellant was entitled to consequential relief as per the judgment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2018 07:18:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=540914" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 306 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369963</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the demand for the extended period of limitation and penalty under section 78. The activity was found exempted for a specific period as per relevant notifications, with the demand from 11.07.2014 deemed sustainable under the amended notification. The appellant was entitled to consequential relief as per the judgment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369963</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>