https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15091 The court held that the share of a coparcener in a Hindu undivided family (HUF) property could be attached and sold for the recovery of individual tax arrears. It concluded that the attachment and proposed auction of the petitioner's share in the HUF property were legal, with the purchaser obtaining the right to seek partition. The court found no illegality in the notice issued under section 222 of the Income-tax Act, dismissing the writ petition without costs. en-us Tue, 03 Aug 1999 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 31 Jul 2009 18:45:15 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15091 The court held that the share of a coparcener in a Hindu undivided family (HUF) property could be attached and sold for the recovery of individual tax arrears. It concluded that the attachment and proposed auction of the petitioner's share in the HUF property were legal, with the purchaser obtaining the right to seek partition. The court found no illegality in the notice issued under section 222 of the Income-tax Act, dismissing the writ petition without costs. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 03 Aug 1999 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15091