<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 299 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369956</link>
    <description>The tribunal concluded that the appellant was legally entitled to the rebate claim, and the order for recovery of the rebate was deemed illegal and not tenable. Therefore, the impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2020 13:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=540907" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 299 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369956</link>
      <description>The tribunal concluded that the appellant was legally entitled to the rebate claim, and the order for recovery of the rebate was deemed illegal and not tenable. Therefore, the impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369956</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>