<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 296 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369953</link>
    <description>The case involved disputes over the interpretation and application of various exemption notifications related to duty demands on pig iron and steel scraps, captively consumed goods, intermediate products used in repair and maintenance, and specific goods manufacturing. The appeals centered on whether the respondent correctly availed exemptions under the relevant notifications. The Revenue challenged the duty demands, arguing for their validity. The Tribunal considered case laws and circulars to interpret the exemption notifications and ultimately upheld the Commissioner&#039;s decision to drop duty demands, ruling in favor of the respondent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2018 07:18:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=540904" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 296 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369953</link>
      <description>The case involved disputes over the interpretation and application of various exemption notifications related to duty demands on pig iron and steel scraps, captively consumed goods, intermediate products used in repair and maintenance, and specific goods manufacturing. The appeals centered on whether the respondent correctly availed exemptions under the relevant notifications. The Revenue challenged the duty demands, arguing for their validity. The Tribunal considered case laws and circulars to interpret the exemption notifications and ultimately upheld the Commissioner&#039;s decision to drop duty demands, ruling in favor of the respondent.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369953</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>