<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 288 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369945</link>
    <description>Classification of the product under the higher tax entry was not accepted because an earlier decision had already treated the same product as an industrial input under a pari materia provision. The challenge was rejected on that basis, and the Special Leave Petitions were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2018 07:17:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=540896" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 288 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369945</link>
      <description>Classification of the product under the higher tax entry was not accepted because an earlier decision had already treated the same product as an industrial input under a pari materia provision. The challenge was rejected on that basis, and the Special Leave Petitions were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369945</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>