<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 261 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369918</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, holding that the Assessing Officer erred in rejecting the claim of Long Term Capital Gain (LTCG) exemption. The Tribunal found the assessee provided substantial evidence supporting the genuineness of the transactions, leading to the deletion of the entire sale consideration added as income and the estimated commission expenses. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of concrete evidence over suspicion and presumption in tax assessments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2018 13:30:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=540811" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 261 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369918</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, holding that the Assessing Officer erred in rejecting the claim of Long Term Capital Gain (LTCG) exemption. The Tribunal found the assessee provided substantial evidence supporting the genuineness of the transactions, leading to the deletion of the entire sale consideration added as income and the estimated commission expenses. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of concrete evidence over suspicion and presumption in tax assessments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369918</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>