<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 253 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369910</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the assessee demonstrated a clear intention to continue the business despite challenges, allowing for the deduction of business expenses and depreciation. The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to thoroughly examine the genuineness and allowability of expenses, emphasizing the treatment of employee costs and VRS expenses as legitimate business expenditures. Additionally, the Tribunal instructed the AO to consider the proper tax treatment of income and losses, ensuring compliance with relevant provisions of the Income Tax Act and judicial precedents. The case was remanded for detailed examination and adherence to legal requirements.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2018 13:30:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=540802" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 253 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369910</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the assessee demonstrated a clear intention to continue the business despite challenges, allowing for the deduction of business expenses and depreciation. The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to thoroughly examine the genuineness and allowability of expenses, emphasizing the treatment of employee costs and VRS expenses as legitimate business expenditures. Additionally, the Tribunal instructed the AO to consider the proper tax treatment of income and losses, ensuring compliance with relevant provisions of the Income Tax Act and judicial precedents. The case was remanded for detailed examination and adherence to legal requirements.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369910</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>