<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (6) TMI 554 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276292</link>
    <description>The Bombay HC ruled on 6th July, 2007, that respondents cannot impose additional tax on the petitioner. The petitioner can conduct lawful business without hindrance but not unlawful activities. Respondents&#039; investigation, including computer seizure, can continue. Petitioner can challenge independently. Case to be grouped with others on 6th July, 2007.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2018 12:41:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=540795" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (6) TMI 554 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276292</link>
      <description>The Bombay HC ruled on 6th July, 2007, that respondents cannot impose additional tax on the petitioner. The petitioner can conduct lawful business without hindrance but not unlawful activities. Respondents&#039; investigation, including computer seizure, can continue. Petitioner can challenge independently. Case to be grouped with others on 6th July, 2007.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276292</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>