<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 250 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369907</link>
    <description>The NCLAT&#039;s judgment resolved the primary issue of the Appellant&#039;s eligibility under Section 29A, overturned the previous finding of ineligibility based on the &quot;related party&quot; status, and directed the approval process for the Appellant&#039;s Resolution Plan to proceed. The judgment underscores the importance of adhering to legal findings and timelines in the CIRP to ensure a fair and efficient resolution process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2018 11:28:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=540786" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 250 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369907</link>
      <description>The NCLAT&#039;s judgment resolved the primary issue of the Appellant&#039;s eligibility under Section 29A, overturned the previous finding of ineligibility based on the &quot;related party&quot; status, and directed the approval process for the Appellant&#039;s Resolution Plan to proceed. The judgment underscores the importance of adhering to legal findings and timelines in the CIRP to ensure a fair and efficient resolution process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369907</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>