<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 247 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369904</link>
    <description>The petition seeking winding up of the respondent Company under Sections 433(e) and 434(f) of the Companies Act, 1956 was admitted by the court. The Official Liquidator was appointed as the Provisional Liquidator, tasked with taking over assets, books of accounts, and records of the respondent-company. Citations were to be published, and the petitioner was required to deposit funds for publication costs. The Official Liquidator was directed to inventory assets, seal premises, value assets, and seize bank accounts. The appointment was suspended for four weeks, subject to revocation upon payment of the outstanding amount by the respondents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2018 11:27:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=540783" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 247 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369904</link>
      <description>The petition seeking winding up of the respondent Company under Sections 433(e) and 434(f) of the Companies Act, 1956 was admitted by the court. The Official Liquidator was appointed as the Provisional Liquidator, tasked with taking over assets, books of accounts, and records of the respondent-company. Citations were to be published, and the petitioner was required to deposit funds for publication costs. The Official Liquidator was directed to inventory assets, seal premises, value assets, and seize bank accounts. The appointment was suspended for four weeks, subject to revocation upon payment of the outstanding amount by the respondents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369904</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>