<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 239 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369896</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal of M/s Rajaram NS Bandekar &amp;amp; Co Pvt Ltd, upholding the recovery of the differential duty and rejecting their claims for exemption eligibility and refund of duty paid at the time of export. The decision emphasized the importance of the &#039;let export order&#039; date in determining duty liability, citing relevant legal provisions and precedents under the Customs Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2018 11:27:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=540770" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 239 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369896</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal of M/s Rajaram NS Bandekar &amp;amp; Co Pvt Ltd, upholding the recovery of the differential duty and rejecting their claims for exemption eligibility and refund of duty paid at the time of export. The decision emphasized the importance of the &#039;let export order&#039; date in determining duty liability, citing relevant legal provisions and precedents under the Customs Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369896</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>