<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 233 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369890</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the inclusion of the value of SIM cards in the assessable value of the taxable service, the invocation of the extended period of limitation, and the imposition of penalties and interest. However, it remanded the matter for re-quantification of the demand of service tax after considering the service tax already paid by the appellants. The Tribunal also held that it could not permit the adjustment of VAT paid towards the demand for Service Tax.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2019 13:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=540761" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 233 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369890</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the inclusion of the value of SIM cards in the assessable value of the taxable service, the invocation of the extended period of limitation, and the imposition of penalties and interest. However, it remanded the matter for re-quantification of the demand of service tax after considering the service tax already paid by the appellants. The Tribunal also held that it could not permit the adjustment of VAT paid towards the demand for Service Tax.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369890</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>