https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15075 The High Court affirmed the Tribunal's findings that the son, not the father, was the owner of the seized valuables and unrecorded transactions. The Court emphasized that factual determinations should not be interfered with unless found to be perverse. Consequently, both issues raised were decided in favor of the assessee, leading to the disposal of the application and directing all parties to comply with the judgment's operative portion. en-us Mon, 13 Mar 2000 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 30 Jul 2009 15:19:09 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15075 The High Court affirmed the Tribunal's findings that the son, not the father, was the owner of the seized valuables and unrecorded transactions. The Court emphasized that factual determinations should not be interfered with unless found to be perverse. Consequently, both issues raised were decided in favor of the assessee, leading to the disposal of the application and directing all parties to comply with the judgment's operative portion. Case-Laws Income Tax Mon, 13 Mar 2000 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15075