<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 223 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369880</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the demand of cenvat credit in respect of Education Cess and Secondary &amp;amp; Higher Education Cess was maintained. However, the demand of interest and penalty was set aside as the appellant had not wrongly availed or utilized the credit. The appeal was allowed in favor of the appellant, and the penalty under Section 11AC was deemed not imposable due to no suppression of facts and non-utilization of the credit after reversal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2018 18:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=540745" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 223 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369880</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the demand of cenvat credit in respect of Education Cess and Secondary &amp;amp; Higher Education Cess was maintained. However, the demand of interest and penalty was set aside as the appellant had not wrongly availed or utilized the credit. The appeal was allowed in favor of the appellant, and the penalty under Section 11AC was deemed not imposable due to no suppression of facts and non-utilization of the credit after reversal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369880</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>