<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 221 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369878</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant in all issues, setting aside the impugned Orders and allowing the appeals with consequential benefits. The appellant successfully argued for exemption under Notification No. 12/2012-CE for supplying Control Valves to Mega Power Projects and against the demand of duty on industrial valves captively consumed under Notification No. 67/95-CE. The Tribunal considered precedents and legal provisions, ultimately finding in favor of the appellant based on the established case law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 04 Nov 2018 21:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=540742" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 221 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369878</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant in all issues, setting aside the impugned Orders and allowing the appeals with consequential benefits. The appellant successfully argued for exemption under Notification No. 12/2012-CE for supplying Control Valves to Mega Power Projects and against the demand of duty on industrial valves captively consumed under Notification No. 67/95-CE. The Tribunal considered precedents and legal provisions, ultimately finding in favor of the appellant based on the established case law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369878</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>