https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276283 A certificate for leave to appeal to the Privy Council was ineffective because the statutory conditions for jurisdiction under Section 596 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1882, were not satisfied. The certificate stated that the valuation was below Rs. 10,000 while still purporting to certify compliance with the provision, creating an internal inconsistency. Even where an affirmed decree required a substantial question of law, that condition could not replace the valuation requirement. The surrounding order also did not show that the judges had judicially addressed the correct statutory basis for certification. The result was that the certificate was invalid and leave to appeal was not properly granted. en-us Tue, 18 Jun 1901 00:00:00 +0521 Mon, 05 Nov 2018 10:39:36 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276283 A certificate for leave to appeal to the Privy Council was ineffective because the statutory conditions for jurisdiction under Section 596 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1882, were not satisfied. The certificate stated that the valuation was below Rs. 10,000 while still purporting to certify compliance with the provision, creating an internal inconsistency. Even where an affirmed decree required a substantial question of law, that condition could not replace the valuation requirement. The surrounding order also did not show that the judges had judicially addressed the correct statutory basis for certification. The result was that the certificate was invalid and leave to appeal was not properly granted. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 18 Jun 1901 00:00:00 +0521 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276283