<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (10) TMI 1384 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276275</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal partly, granting relief on the curtailment of deduction under section 10A and transfer pricing adjustments while dismissing the unpressed grounds. The order emphasized the necessity of proving an arrangement for profit manipulation to invoke section 10A(7) read with section 80IA(10) and the importance of selecting functionally comparable companies for transfer pricing analysis.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 04 Nov 2018 20:30:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=540720" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (10) TMI 1384 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276275</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal partly, granting relief on the curtailment of deduction under section 10A and transfer pricing adjustments while dismissing the unpressed grounds. The order emphasized the necessity of proving an arrangement for profit manipulation to invoke section 10A(7) read with section 80IA(10) and the importance of selecting functionally comparable companies for transfer pricing analysis.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276275</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>