<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (4) TMI 31 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15071</link>
    <description>Section 245 of the Income-tax Act permits adjustment of a refund against an outstanding tax demand only after prior written intimation of the proposed set-off is given to the assessee. Where no such intimation is issued, the adjustment does not comply with the statutory mandate and is invalid. The text states that the refund was set off without prior notice, making the action contrary to section 245 and unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Apr 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 14:13:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=54071" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (4) TMI 31 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15071</link>
      <description>Section 245 of the Income-tax Act permits adjustment of a refund against an outstanding tax demand only after prior written intimation of the proposed set-off is given to the assessee. Where no such intimation is issued, the adjustment does not comply with the statutory mandate and is invalid. The text states that the refund was set off without prior notice, making the action contrary to section 245 and unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Apr 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15071</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>