<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1956 (2) TMI 71 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276257</link>
    <description>Amounts received by a shareholder on liquidation were treated as outside capital gains because the receipt did not arise from the shareholder&#039;s sale of a capital asset; it stemmed from the sale of the company&#039;s assets. The liquidation payment was also outside dividend taxation to the extent the proviso to section 2(6A)(c) limited assessable distributions to accumulated profits from the company&#039;s previous six accounting years before liquidation. Profits arising in the company&#039;s year ending with liquidation were excluded, and the shareholder&#039;s own accounting year was irrelevant. The amount was therefore not taxable under section 12B and was excluded from assessment under the proviso.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 1956 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2018 15:31:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=540696" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1956 (2) TMI 71 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276257</link>
      <description>Amounts received by a shareholder on liquidation were treated as outside capital gains because the receipt did not arise from the shareholder&#039;s sale of a capital asset; it stemmed from the sale of the company&#039;s assets. The liquidation payment was also outside dividend taxation to the extent the proviso to section 2(6A)(c) limited assessable distributions to accumulated profits from the company&#039;s previous six accounting years before liquidation. Profits arising in the company&#039;s year ending with liquidation were excluded, and the shareholder&#039;s own accounting year was irrelevant. The amount was therefore not taxable under section 12B and was excluded from assessment under the proviso.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 1956 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276257</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>