https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276253 The appeal was dismissed, and the court held that the appellant's earnings from his position in the Indian Civil Service are partible under Hindu law. The court emphasized that gains from specialized education funded by the family are considered joint property, following established principles. The appellant's argument that his gains were acquired through personal efforts was rejected, with the court emphasizing the importance of consistency in applying traditional rules to modern circumstances. The judgment reaffirmed that the burden of proof lies with the appellant to show exceptions to the general rule of partibility in joint Hindu family property. en-us Mon, 24 Jan 1921 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 03 Nov 2018 14:36:13 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276253 The appeal was dismissed, and the court held that the appellant's earnings from his position in the Indian Civil Service are partible under Hindu law. The court emphasized that gains from specialized education funded by the family are considered joint property, following established principles. The appellant's argument that his gains were acquired through personal efforts was rejected, with the court emphasizing the importance of consistency in applying traditional rules to modern circumstances. The judgment reaffirmed that the burden of proof lies with the appellant to show exceptions to the general rule of partibility in joint Hindu family property. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 24 Jan 1921 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276253