https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276251 Conviction for unlicensed possession of cartridges was sustained on concurrent findings of fact, but the sentence was interfered with because the sentencing assessment had been influenced by inadmissible material suggesting the appellant's alleged supply of ammunition to dacoits. In the absence of any shown previous conviction, that adverse material was not supported by admissible evidence and could not properly justify the original punishment. The appellate court therefore reduced the sentence from two years' rigorous imprisonment to one year's rigorous imprisonment while leaving the conviction undisturbed, applying the principle that sentence may be corrected to secure the ends of justice when tainted by inadmissible considerations. en-us Mon, 15 Oct 1973 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 03 Nov 2018 14:17:44 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276251 Conviction for unlicensed possession of cartridges was sustained on concurrent findings of fact, but the sentence was interfered with because the sentencing assessment had been influenced by inadmissible material suggesting the appellant's alleged supply of ammunition to dacoits. In the absence of any shown previous conviction, that adverse material was not supported by admissible evidence and could not properly justify the original punishment. The appellate court therefore reduced the sentence from two years' rigorous imprisonment to one year's rigorous imprisonment while leaving the conviction undisturbed, applying the principle that sentence may be corrected to secure the ends of justice when tainted by inadmissible considerations. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 15 Oct 1973 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276251