<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 207 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369864</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s Miscellaneous Application, affirming the documented sale value of Rs. 18,30,000 for calculating long-term capital gains. It held that the Tribunal lacks the power to review its own orders under section 254(2) unless there are manifest errors. The Tribunal found no apparent error in its previous order and emphasized that rectification is limited to correcting mistakes, not reviewing decisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2018 13:36:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=540647" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 207 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369864</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s Miscellaneous Application, affirming the documented sale value of Rs. 18,30,000 for calculating long-term capital gains. It held that the Tribunal lacks the power to review its own orders under section 254(2) unless there are manifest errors. The Tribunal found no apparent error in its previous order and emphasized that rectification is limited to correcting mistakes, not reviewing decisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369864</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>