<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 202 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369859</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, declaring the assessment order invalid due to the Assessing Officer&#039;s lack of jurisdiction to pass it on a non-existent entity resulting from an amalgamation. The assessment on the non-existent entity was deemed a jurisdictional defect, leading to the nullification of the assessment order. Consequently, the issue of addition of unexplained advances under section 68 of the Income Tax Act was not addressed on its merits, as the assessment order was quashed based on the jurisdictional flaw.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2018 13:36:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=540639" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 202 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369859</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, declaring the assessment order invalid due to the Assessing Officer&#039;s lack of jurisdiction to pass it on a non-existent entity resulting from an amalgamation. The assessment on the non-existent entity was deemed a jurisdictional defect, leading to the nullification of the assessment order. Consequently, the issue of addition of unexplained advances under section 68 of the Income Tax Act was not addressed on its merits, as the assessment order was quashed based on the jurisdictional flaw.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369859</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>