<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (3) TMI 22 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15063</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the assessee, allowing the foreign collaboration fee as a revenue expenditure for the assessment year 1974-75. The decision was based on the specific terms of the agreement, the purpose of the collaboration, and the absence of evidence supporting enduring benefits beyond the single crane project. The assessee was awarded costs amounting to Rs. 1,000.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 13:52:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=54063" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (3) TMI 22 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15063</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the assessee, allowing the foreign collaboration fee as a revenue expenditure for the assessment year 1974-75. The decision was based on the specific terms of the agreement, the purpose of the collaboration, and the absence of evidence supporting enduring benefits beyond the single crane project. The assessee was awarded costs amounting to Rs. 1,000.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15063</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>