<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 196 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369853</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the petition seeking the winding up of the respondent company under Section 433(c) of the Companies Act, 1956. The court found that the company was profitable and that the petitioner&#039;s primary intention seemed to be liquidating shareholdings rather than genuine concerns over company operations. Emphasizing the possibility of the company&#039;s revival and the discretionary nature of winding-up orders, the court concluded that there were no grounds for passing a winding-up order, leading to the dismissal of the petition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2018 08:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=540629" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 196 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369853</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the petition seeking the winding up of the respondent company under Section 433(c) of the Companies Act, 1956. The court found that the company was profitable and that the petitioner&#039;s primary intention seemed to be liquidating shareholdings rather than genuine concerns over company operations. Emphasizing the possibility of the company&#039;s revival and the discretionary nature of winding-up orders, the court concluded that there were no grounds for passing a winding-up order, leading to the dismissal of the petition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369853</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>