https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369851 A clarificatory trade notice on restricted yellow pea imports was treated as consistent with the original notification and not as an impermissible amendment, because it only explained how the advance-payment eligibility condition operated within the existing policy framework. The brief withdrawal of the restriction on 29.08.2018, followed by immediate reimposition, did not create an entitlement to clearance where the petitioner had not made the imports during any operative window or shown that the goods were already in transit or otherwise covered by the protected category. The policy restrictions and the clarification were therefore upheld as valid. en-us Wed, 24 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 24 Jun 2019 15:18:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369851 A clarificatory trade notice on restricted yellow pea imports was treated as consistent with the original notification and not as an impermissible amendment, because it only explained how the advance-payment eligibility condition operated within the existing policy framework. The brief withdrawal of the restriction on 29.08.2018, followed by immediate reimposition, did not create an entitlement to clearance where the petitioner had not made the imports during any operative window or shown that the goods were already in transit or otherwise covered by the protected category. The policy restrictions and the clarification were therefore upheld as valid. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 24 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369851